How Can Technologists Work on Improving Cyber Security in Your Company?
Technologists across all industries are concerned that their firms are becoming less secure. Over the last two years, the change to cloud-native applications and architecture has resulted in a substantial increase in attack surfaces, as well as an increase in the scope and sophistication of cybercrime threats.
While IT departments have accelerated their digital transformation efforts by leveraging low-code and no-code platforms to increase release velocity and construct more dynamic applications, security has yet to catch up. During the pandemic, as many as 92% of engineers admit that the rush to swiftly innovate and respond to changing client and user needs has come at the price of robust application security throughout software development.
ALSO READ: The Newest Innovations in Technology: What You Need to Know
Technologists highlight six significant difficulties that must be overcome to incorporate this type of comprehensive application security approach inside their firms :
-
The volume of Security Threats
The magnitude of security threats and vulnerabilities to their organization causes many technologists to feel overwhelmed. IT departments just do not have enough time in the day to discover and analyze the increasing number of risks.
AI and Machine Learning (ML) are increasingly required to detect gaps, predict risks, and automate operations to close security loopholes. Moreover, more than three-quarters of technologists feel that AI will play an increasingly critical role in addressing the application security concerns that their organization faces in terms of speed, scalability, and expertise.
-
Lack of Intel Into Attack Surfaces
Well over two-thirds of technologists say their existing security solutions perform effectively in silos but not together, preventing them from getting a complete picture of their organization’s security posture.
As a result, IT teams must combine efficiency and security monitoring to determine how vulnerabilities and events may affect end users and the company. Having a thorough grasp of this would let them discover and stop exploits automatically, boosting speed and uptime while minimizing risk.
-
Lack of Timely Applicability of Needed Measures
Many firms still regard security as a barrier to innovation, and with release velocity as the top focus, security teams have been shut out of the application development process until the very final stage of the development pipeline.
Technologists must abandon established mindsets in favor of a more collaborative method of working, as well as learn novel abilities and expertise outside of their profession.
ALSO READ: Microsoft Supported OpenAI to Enable ChatGPT User Customization
-
Need to Prioritise Threats Based on Severity and Impact
IT teams are inundated with security alerts from throughout the application stack, and they have no way of sorting through the noise to determine which signals are truly dangerous. As a result, more than half of IT departments are in ‘security limbo,’ unsure of what to focus on and prioritize.
Business transaction data are critical for assisting IT teams in determining the seriousness of – and prioritizing – threats based on severity grading. These scores take into account the threat’s context, allowing technologists to see which concerns are likely to impact a business-critical region of the environment or application.
-
Difficulty in Keeping Up with the Changing Scenario
Overall, as many as 83% of technologists say it is difficult to keep up with evolving dangers. Because of the increasing implementation of the Internet of Things (IoT) and linked devices, as well as the use of microservice-based application architectures, attack surfaces are growing dramatically. Modern hybrid working patterns have revealed new vulnerabilities for businesses across all industries.
In response, technologists must rely on partners for data and insights into new security threats, as well as map these threats against the security posture of their firm.
-
Protection of Sensitive Data
With software modules running across multi-cloud environments and on-premise databases, many technologists are suddenly losing control of where data lives within their application portfolios.
The quantities of client data included within many of these systems create visibility holes and increase the danger of a significant security event.
As a result, technologists must develop runtime application self-protection (RASP), which gives visibility from within apps and allows them to be guarded wherever they live and however they are deployed.
Conclusion
Companies can no longer afford to ignore application security. It must be regarded as a fundamental component of the application lifecycle and the foundation upon which enterprises may deliver agile development and accelerated innovation.
As a result, technologists must do all possible to overcome the hurdles they confront and ensure they have the tools, insights, and processes required to adopt a security approach across the entire application stack.
