The Privacy Paradox: Examining the Accessibility of Our Thoughts in the Digital Era
Yes, however, it depends on the scale and the level of detail. Worldwide, consumer brain wearables are sold in the millions. To track brain activity, these come in the shape of headbands or sensors that can be incorporated into a hard hat or a baseball cap. The algorithm is interpreting such action, although their capabilities are currently relatively constrained. They can read a person’s attention, engagement, state of mind, and fundamental emotions like stress, joy, or melancholy.
Major tech companies are making investments in incorporating brain sensors into common items like earbuds, headphones, and even wearable tattoos, similar to how we see heart rate monitors in watches and rings.
ALSO READ: Insights from Brain Monitoring of Four Dying Patients: Check out what scientists found?
These are not mind-reading technologies and cannot comprehend our in-depth ideas. Electroencephalography (EEG), which detects electrical activity in your brain when you’re thinking or feeling anything, is a frequently utilized technique. These patterns are deciphered using potent algorithms. It may gauge attention, mental wandering, and fundamental feelings and emotions from this.
Will This Affect Mental Health and Well-Being?
Devices that stimulate the brain electrically or through neurofeedback are licensed for the treatment of depression. Similar to how people track their pulse rate, respiration, and amount of steps taken, users could utilize the data to identify early stages of mental health illnesses or neurological disorders.
This objective brain data will probably be used to normalize tracking mental health data. The algorithms may mistakenly classify persons in the early stages of this as having a neuro-atypical brain condition. To determine whether they should be concerned about something, people will also be looking at their data.
Is This an Invasion of Liberty?
Setting up a global legal framework and a norm that acknowledges that the self-determination of our brains and mental experiences is vital is an excellent first step in updating our current rights and our interpretations of them.
ALSO READ: Brain-Eating Amoebas Are a New Concern in Northern US States
Moreover, it puts the right of individuals to control their personal information ahead of a company’s right to commercialize it. Rather than a general rule allowing businesses to gather, market, extract, and analyze the data for any objective they choose. The first step is to change the current system, which favors companies over people, and hence, grants people access to the knowledge stored in their brains.
The risk to our privacy is one of the main issues with the technologies we’re discussing. The idea is that technologies may access, track, and hack our minds in ways that are harmful to human well-being. A right to self-determination of our minds, cognitive liberty modernizes the idea of liberty for the digital era.
Mental privacy should be protected within the ambit of the human right to privacy. To prevent access to our powerful thoughts and mental images, the right to freedom of thinking should be understood outside concepts of religion and belief. And the right to self-determination ought to grant us the freedom to access and modify our minds as we see fit.
ALSO READ: Reclaiming Youth: Discover the Secrets to Reverse Your Biological Age with New Study Findings
Conclusion
The toll that neurological illness and pain take on a person is astounding. Our physical well-being and longevity are increasing, but our well-being and mental health are deteriorating. Technology of this nature could empower people and prevent them from giving in to their mental suffering if it offers us the means to take control of our brain health. Of course, compliance with rules and oversight are essential when discussing such an advent.
